|
||||||
|
||||||
| Home Spring Summer Autumn Small Waters Russia Voodoo | ||||||
|
||||||
Despite all of the headlines, it’s not unknown for people to go back home with less than 10 fish for their week if they can’t hack the pace or are not up to snuff in the skills department. Both Paul and I blanked at least one session. So much for the theory that the Varzuga is nothing more than a series of “Duffer’s Corners” where you can haul ‘em out with one hand whilst having a glass of Pimms in the other. The water is also monochrome and very unlike most Scottish rivers. You need to learn to read it, pool by pool, section by section, and think about where the fish will be. The bigger fish and bigger pods are inevitably nearer the middle of the river or around defined underwater structures, so you look for boils and riffles, popply water and ripply water, edges of rips and stones. It all gets very technical. One day later in the week, for example, the fishing got slow because a hard sun had come out into a cloudless sky and temperatures had climbed into the 20’s centigrade. Most of us got the odd fish on floaters but Nick and Bill, fishing independently, figured out that the heat and brightness was driving the salmon down deep to cooler water, so they put on fast sink leaders and slammed them all afternoon. Obvious to everyone. In retrospect. When, or more accurately if, you hit a fresh pod of salmon moving up from the sea the action can be fast and furious. Jim, a very softly spoken but totally switched on guy from Oregon, hit payday with 20 paint-fresh fish from the same place in one session. But just because they were there didn’t mean that it was easy - he still had to catch each and every one. For my sins, I found some similar pods that were in a taking mood and managed to miss or lose more than I caught: out of 31 takes one day I only got 12 to the net. And that is the great thing about this river. You get so many opportunities at fish that you start to detect patterns in what you are doing: both the right things and the wrong things. In short, you learn. You get a chance to experiment with new techniques: ways of hooking fish; ways of presenting the fly; ways of playing fish. You do things that the average Scottish ghillie would simply shake his head at and leave you to the river, muttering about your retarded and disputed parentage as he went. Even with air and water temperatures so low we were catching fish on floating lines, sometimes with sink tips but just as often not. Flies were cast square across and with the fast flows they literally hurtled through the water over the salmon’s heads. Takes were usually savage and if you fed them line from an over-loose drag or a loop you invariably missed them altogether or lost them after a few seconds because of a light hook-hold: something that cost me most of my fish and something I learned too late. When hooked they are highly acrobatic, almost like sea-trout, and will tear yards of line off your screaming reel. I have never before had so much backing out with any salmon I have caught. I became an addict of using a riffle hitch which proved to be a great way of preserving the fish population of the Varzuga as it conspired to make fly fishing for salmon, an already inefficient method of catching them, even more inefficient. What was that you said? How did I do? Well, just to set the record straight you understand, I caught no more and no less than I was supposed to catch. Also, you have to define the word “caught”. You see on a catch and release fishery, I would say that “caught” means getting them to where you can touch the leader (as in big game fishing) or to where any reasonably competent ghillie could net it. Unfortunately the Russians fail that last test and have a vague slashing technique with a net that has to be seen to be admired. We devised a Mishalunge Star system for grading performance whilst we were there. So my definition of “caught” was my definition of caught. I couldn’t help but notice, though, that Paul stoically refused to count fish unless they were in the net. That meant that it was rather meaningless to compare our catches and so, out of fairness (and not a little shame for my cavalier attitude to the craft) I adopted his rules and only counted fish that went in the net or that I had laid hands on to release on the shore. But I can see that it’s the numbers that you really want to hear about: OK, out of the127 opportunities I had in my week to catch a salmon; 17 of them failed to actually eat the fly by missing it as it sped past them; 17 of them ate the fly but I didn’t manage to hook them because of a skill deficit on my part; 28 of them came off during the fight, again due to avoidable skill shortages; 1 of them was hooked in the tail when it launched itself out of the water after a riffled fly; and 64 gleaming, glorious bars of silver were netted, released and I therefore counted as caught. I could be pedantic and add 5 grayling, 2 kelts and a perch...but that would be nit-picking. For me, it was nothing short of a stunning performance. And, if I work it out in monetary terms, each fish cost me a tiny fraction of what I used to pay per fish on the Spey. I reckon Tulchan did me a big favour by giving my rod to someone else you know. However, to get back to the numbers game, out of the twelve anglers who fished the beat I was firmly in the lower half of the performance stakes. Below me, there were two very gentlemanly English anglers who were out there with nothing to prove and enjoying every second of it. Then there was a Belgian gentleman who was new to all of this. Then there was another English chap who had casting problems for some of the week which held him back. And then there was me. Paul actually caught the same number of fish as I did but in my humble opinion he was the better of us because out of the opportunities he had, he lost or missed very few making him demonstrably better able to “Do The Right Thing” when the chips were down. The top day’s catch was made by Jim with 30. I will repeat that for the non-believers – thirty salmon in one day. You can close your mouth now, you’re dribbling. The biggest fish was 17lb caught by Nick followed by Jim and Paul with fish at 16lb each. The top angler was an intense Dutchman called Hugo. He was a large and very powerful man who waded the river up to his nostrils and caught a mind numbing 137 fish on a single handed rod for his week. I named him, in what I thought was a waggish and witty way, RoboCaster. He didn’t punch me for doing so, but I wasn’t entirely sure that it hadn’t crossed his mind. Overall, the camp caught 823 salmon for the week: that’s more than all of the beats on Tulchan get in a year. As fishing porn goes that's hardcore. Oh yes, those helicopters are dangerous right enough. Whilst running for one on the return journey I managed to fall over and badly twist my ankle which subsequently swelled up like a grapefruit. The Russian guide, Vova, who ran to pick me up patted me on the shoulder and, completely deadpan, said simply “Perestroika”. Love it.
|
||||||